Dr. O P. Sudrania exposed as a fantasist

The mendacity, false humility and cocksure false statements of an Indian eye-doctor, Mr. Om Prakash Sudrania, is both instructive and depressing. This 'humble' apologist for Sathya Sai Baba had also set about vilyfying my name in an article in 2011 which he strangely entitled ‘Sri Satya Sai Baba and His Robert Priddy’ (as if I were Sai Baba’s possession in some remote way, which I am remotely far from being). He failed to correct anything after being made aware of his gross and offensive misrepresentations of me (who he never knew) without more than most superficial investigation - and then only for the purpose of his attempt to discredit me without evidence. Readers can see what he wrote and make up their own minds about him, his other target Hans de Kraker and I. His comments on the sex abuse testimony by Hans de Kraker which are scanned from The Telegraph obituary on Sai Baba show how hypocritical Sai followers become when confronted. Firstly, I mention a few of his blunders there (see the full revealing scans of the exchange of comments on this link) Sudrania mentioned my role as a leader in the Sathya Sai Organization and as an academician (as if to cover himself against the charge of total ignorance about me) but shows that he has not read any of the most important pages I have written about why I could not possibly continue to remain a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba (including my credo). For he wrote “…to persist for eighteen years with such a person intimately to denounce him on charges of sexual misconduct (also unproved) with no sign of abatement after so long again sounds hollow and bizarre.” This is all sheer opinion snatched from the air to try to discredit someone who knowledge of facts he does not like. It is impossible for him to understand the conditioners of his mind because he was clearly deeply indoctrinated in Hinduism as most Indians are and found Sai Baba to be an exemplar of ‘divine miracle makers’, even though he admitted he never even experienced Sai Baba close up in any interview. His denial and flimsy ‘investigation’ is evident where he wrote to de Kraker “You could have filed a legal notice against Baba”. But de Kraker replied “I did not file a legal case against Sai Baba as I was a consenting adult.” Instead, he filed an affidavit on the sexual abuse he was subjected to by SB and, further, the former security man at the ashram, Hari Sampath, filed a petition at the Supreme Court against Baba but it was rejected and the public record destroyed (though the litigant’s copy was preserved and legally confirmed!). The Indian judiciary's injustice protected Sai baba at every turn, with the former High Chief Justice Bhagwati acting only on Sai Baba's order in everything, as he has even admitted in the Indian media. Total bias and cover-up… a judge of the bent, elitist kind who ruled the roost in India after Independence. Yet more revealing of Sudrania’s prejudiced attitude was his cocksure words to de Kraker were “Regarding your allegations on the shooting incidence, I am sure you were not present in the ashram nor have you tried to verify the cause.” De Kraker replied, "As far as the shooting incident wa concerned, I was there in 1993 in the ashram. Not just in the ashram, we had been called to come and assist getting intruders out of the ashram… So when the intruders attacked the mandir, some ashram staff approached us. We ran to the mandir. It was a terrible sight. An inch of blood in the interview room….” etc. That Hans de Kraker did not try to learn the cause is obviously a sheer invention of Sudrania. Likewise, the self-deprecating god-blessing hypocrite wrote against me: “He first writes big loud mouthed dissertations, then going all the way backwards to contradict with all his clever blames (offence is the best difence) newly discovered but mindless of his own slippery position, “Why did he stick to Baba for such a long period silently”? What was he doing or researching on there? MRP claims himself as a researcher and teacher but what failed his researches on his Sai Baba for eighteen years? It must be sign of a double and schizophrenic personality at the least or a sign of his criminal conspiracy against Baba acting on behalf of some agency as a secret spy needs a serious investigation.” That is a loud mouht if ever there was one. In short, is about his main activity – fantasizing about people and events on the basis of religious superstition and assumptions he holds so dear. As to Sudrania’s libels against me, you can read them and my rebuttals by clicking here. Previously I posted the following: Dr. Sudrania-Hindustan Times: strongly biased censorship of Sai Baba critics A very relevant comment by a psychologist from the Netherlands was made as follows:- Submitted on 2013/03/18 at 11:27 am Dr. Sudrania’s position is a familiar one, by now, as you surely know full well, Robert. Blinded by his own belief system, a devotee by proxy, with limited knowledge and access to Sai Baba during his life time, he seems utterly convinced he must act as a voice of reason against people who, like you, dare question the veracity of Sathya Sai Baba’s enormous claims. Of course, being a faithful follower, he convinces himself he must answer ‘lovingly’, as a true devotee should… It reminds me of the many rows in Puttaparthi that I witnessed, in which devotees shouted ‘Sai Ram’ at each other, as if this endearing, loving phraseology could cover up their true feelings. Dr. Sudrania makes his opinion of the late saffron sage unequivocally clear by stating: ‘Sri Satya Sai Baba was a towering personality of the highest spiritual order seen in the twentieth and twenty first centuries. Since this ephemeral world suffers from the duality, Baba said that even the Avatars suffer from some human weaknesses when S/He takes on human form. But the difference is, even their such traits are not intentionally meant to harm anyone deliberately, unlike the mortals.’Some human weaknesses indeed, Robert! Love ever, harm never, my foot! I am convinced that his late greatness fully intentioned to do the things he did, speak the words he spoke, that his flaws were plenty and that he meant to harm others if it suited his best interest. It is a sad affair, to see deluded people like this retired doctor lash out at the precious few who, like you, have the courage and endurance to keep informing the public of an important minority’s (or silent majority’s?) opinion, well researched and backed by personal experience. Vilifying the messenger by turning anyone who disagrees with your belief system into a venomous snake is crude and psychologically speaking one of the most primitive of defensive actions. Dr. Sudrania is no lover of uncertainty, except Sai Baba’s. Good for you that you keep on rebutting this kind of sanctimonious drivel. Chris Dokter

Sai Baba harass merchant Gerald Moreno (alias Joe108)

Sai Baba deluded Gerald Moreno (alias Joe108) - had no valid arguments against Priddy In his complete failure to argue cogently to refute the hundreds of documented criticisms against Sathya Sai Baba (see my website, for a start http://www.saibaba-x.org.uk/) joe108 (i.e. Gerald Moreno of Las Cruces, New Mexico - deceased in 2010) resort to libel and attempted character assassination. He tries to associate me fully with Sanjay Dadlani, but for a start I only endorsed some of Dadlani's views, not others. Moreno went to huge lengths to create libels about many scores of critics of Sai Baba (and of his othr gurus), but none more so than Sanjay Dadlani, as one can still see on Google. Moreno defended Sathya Sai Baba and his organization full-time for two years even while having long admitted on his website that believed Sai Baba to be a sexual abuser! See http://www.saibaba-x.org.uk/31/JoeFAQ.htm Almost unbelievable, but true! I was fairly roundly deceived by Sathya Sai Baba for many years, as were millions - including Moreno, who remained in delusion until his dying day. I had eventually been told the awful truth by one of the closest servitors of this self-proclaimed 'God incarnate in human form', the famous journalist V.K. Narasimhan. I felt the heavy duty descend on me to expose the lies and deceptions, including numerous crimes of which he has never been cleared... but It was no easy choice, and not without danger either! (Devotees have been executed in cold-blood - see http://www.exbaba.com/comments_on/_the_secret_swami/_sai_baba.htm/nair.htm). The Alaya Rahm case was concluded for entirely different reason to those invented by Moreno (see http://www.exbaba.com/articles/alayarahm.htm) See fuller analysis of Moreno's web stalking, trolling and defamatory diatribes here.

LISA DE WITT OF HOLM WRIGHT HYDE&HAYES PLC ATTORNEYS
AN INTERNET TROLL WHO USES FILTHY LANGUAGE AND VICIOUS SMEARS AGAINST MANY FORMER FOLLOWERS OF HER GURU, SATHYA SAI BABA

For a legal assistant at a law firm, as is Lisa de Witt, which position she apparently currently holds (see here) to resort to such uncontrolled lies and hate postings is noteworthy. The law firm has removed the URL where they had listed her (last year) as a Legal Assistant who had worked for them for 11 years (a kind of dissociation to protect their name? The defunct page, also removed from the wayback machine, was at http://www.holmwright.com/staff.html. Their current page (http://www.holmwright.com/staff.php) contains no mention of de Witt, though they still employ her. This shows that they condone her fanatical and illegal activities sufficiently to keep on employing her.

A small sample of some of the massive abuse and libel that Lisa de Witt - self-proclaimed Sathya Sai Baba devotee - has employed on Yahoo group sathyasaibaba2 (now defunct after being deleted by the moderator). Her fanatical mind and degenerate moral behaviour is evident from her calling serious critics 'perverts' 'gang bangers' etc. and using all manner of degraded language and assertions about many of them. She carefully hides her address and particulars because she is liable to prosecution for a major libel against Barry Pittard, one whch originated with her sponsor, Gerald Moreno, namely that Barry Pittard fathered a son with an underage girl - is a pedophile. This despite Moreno having himself corrected his mistake (grudgingly and without any apology to Pittard, being the one time he has had to retract one of his many untrue claims).
Lisa de Witt tried to hide behind her Yahoo usernames 'conscientiousobjector2000' and 'Babafan', but her name was eventually traced by some of those who had sustained her verbal assaults for a long time. She still carefully conceals her address or other details which could put her in direct jeopardy of getting a court order against her.
Lisa de Witt: some of her postings on Yahoo:-

Here we see how Lisa de Witt defies all public documentation and prefers to think and say only what she wants - in the face of all facts....

Lisa de Witt's serious libel against Sai critic, Barry Pittard 

The following is her answers to Tony O'Cleary, a former devotee of Sathya Sai Baba who took up the cause of exposing him on various discussion boards and groups, where Lisa de it abused him daily for years:-

The lovely Lisa is a close friend of Joe108 - Gerald Moreno - who for a long time even defended Sai Baba while thinking him to be a sexual abuser (see here)! Though he claimed several years later that Sathya Sai Baba could not be a sexual abuser because he had not been convicted of it (due in fact to his protection to the highest levels of the Indian government and judiciary) Moreno also defended Swami Premananda on his website vishvarupa.com, who is serving a double life sentence for rape and murder after his appeal to the High Court was rejected. This is the apex of denial... shared in totally by Moreno's friend, Lisa de Witt, who continues to support Gerald Moreno even after his death in 2010. Apropos, a  class action case to force removal of Moreno's web-stalking and defamation of over 100 persons is currently under planning and will eventually lead to a subpoena against whoever is currently involved in maintaining his websites through a proxy domain name site.